Cities Must Buy In to Get Residents Free Libraries
In the world of library services, Piedmont has to pay to play.
If you can get something for free, why pay for it? That's the question some Piedmont residents are asking as the city ponders whether to continue its contractual relationship with Oakland for library services.
Given California's philosophy of "universal lending" established during the late 1970s under Jerry Brown's previous tenure as governor, any California resident ought to be able to walk into a library within the state and get a library card to check out materials. So I decided to test the theory.
One cold afternoon in December, I walked into the Piedmont Avenue branch library to see if I could get an Oakland Library card using my picture ID from Nevada County.
On the day I visited, the one-room branch library was more crowded than Starbuck's. I could barely squeeze in the door past the phalanx of kindergartners piling in for their afternoon story time. The little table in the center of the one-room library was packed with patrons using free Internet services, and others sat quietly in a corner reading newspapers and magazines.
Sure enough, my application for a card was approved, and I was allowed to check out two books on a "probationary" basis.
If I could get a card with a Nevada County residence, why couldn't Piedmont residents get one using an Alameda County address?
The answer to that question goes to the heart of universal lending, which works a little like a poker game. You have to ante up to play. I was given a card because Nevada County has a seat at the same table as the Oakland Public Library, State Library Director Stacey Aldrich explained.
Member libraries ante up by agreeing to make their collections available to non-city or non-county residents in exchange for, in some cases, a reimbursement from the state. The Oakland Public Library, for example, would receive $1.17 reimbursement from the state every time I check out materials as a cardholder from outside the jurisdiction. Lend a book to another jurisdiction– what's called an inter-library loan–and the state would reimburse the library $6.35, Aldrich said.
Should Piedmont decide not to renew its contract with Oakland, the city would need to either affiliate with another neighboring library or form its own library to remain a part of the system that supports universal lending.
Many California cities have chosen to form their own libraries in recent years–16 in the past decade alone–but that was an idea rejected in Piedmont more than 20 years ago when the city considered partnering with the school district to form a joint library. Tamra Hege, now President of Piedmont's League of Women Voters, was one of the school board members to kill the measure on a 3-2 vote. Forming its own library proved too costly for Piedmont, and teaming up with the school libraries was too impractical, she said.
In the late 1990s, the city toyed with the idea of teaming up with the San Leandro Public Library instead of Oakland. But that concept faced strong opposition because San Leandro's library is one of the few libraries that do not participate in the statewide California Library Services Association (CLSA).
"We need a library that offers universal borrowing," said Hege.
No one could readily say why Piedmont has never chosen to affiliate with the Alameda County Public Library system, which is based in Fremont with 10 branch libraries. That library has been around since 1910, back when Piedmont was a new city with just a few hundred landowners.
Along with San Leandro, Berkeley also opted not to participate in the Alameda County library system. Berkeley's library, however, is a member of the CLSA and allows non-residents to get a library card for free. San Leandro charges a $60 annual fee to non-residents.
In today's cyber-era, books and DVDs and the stuff of brick and mortar libraries are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to free resources. And with universal lending, that opens up huge collections to anyone living in a library jurisdiction with a seat at the CLSA table.
Get a card from the neighboring Contra Costa County Library, for example, and you would have at-home access to thousands of online databases, including the OneFile, which is like an online version of the archaic Reader's Guide to Periodical Literature. Within a matter of seconds, one can search–by topic, title or author–literally hundreds of thousands of published articles from trade journals to magazines such as National Geographic and Time.
It's at your fingertips, and if you're a cardholder, it's free. As the walls begin to come down on libraries, collections like these might be available statewide. Aldrich said the state is currently negotiating with vendors to create a similar service patrons can use with a debit card that would help defer the costs of the service.
If Piedmont chooses to remain a player in that ever-expanding statewide system, the city either needs to form its own library or ante up with Oakland or Alameda County for access.
Len Gilbert
6:48 am on Thursday, January 6, 2011
As frequent users of the Oakland libraries, I consider the resources extremely valuable for my family. However, the cost has to be appropriate. As I understand it from the other Patch article referenced, Piedmont offerred a 5% increase. That's more than most people's salary will increase this year and seems fair. However Oakland wants more than that. How much? It's an unknown. Would setting up and maintaining a Piedmont library cost more than $400k per year?
Peter Schroepfer
10:08 am on Thursday, January 6, 2011
As an Oaklander who has always found Piedmont rather amusing as a readily available case study for so many disciplines, I'll be watching this story develop.
The relationship between the two cities is also interesting, in some ways like the US and Canada. Oakland has just got to have a SWAT team, Piedmont does not. But one day for some reason or another Piedmont will need one for a day, and it is Oakland that will respond. Meanwhile Oakland will be paying to maintain it all along, this while we need money for our schools here in Oakland, while of course Piedmont Edu Foundation's fundraising project "Dress Best for Less" is located near Oakland's Piedmont Ave. Oh well, such is life. But any talk from Piedmont about "why pay when it's free" is utterly repulsive in this context.
For what it's worth, San Leandro city library requires Oakland residents to pay $50 for a library card. This may have changed, but I tried to get one two years ago and it was the case then. I'm not sure if San Leandro requires this of all out-of-city library users, but it was explained to me in reference to "Oakland residents."
Which is to say, it is probably entirely possible for Oakland to just decide that Piedmont residents can't use Oakland libraries. Piedmonters are welcome to feel offended if they end up feeling like Oakland is milking them for more cash, but if the "why pay when it's free" becomes the motive for not paying at all, I'll lead the cause for excluding Piedmont. Have a nice day.
Len Gilbert
11:25 am on Thursday, January 6, 2011
I think Piedmont should continue to pay for the library service and I support paying a fair share for the service. The author also ends with "If Piedmont chooses to remain a player in that ever-expanding statewide system, the city either needs to form its own library or ante up with Oakland or Alameda County for access."
There is an interdependency between the town of Piedmont and city of Oakland. I know Piedmont resident's taxes pay for excellent fire and police services, which thankfully, we don't need very often. That allows our fire and police to respond to Oakland emergencies to assist the efforts of fire and police staff in Oakland, where cuts have had an impact on services. This approach is beneficial to both cities. Library access can be a similar scenario, where Piedmont can help the Oakland libraries by continuing to pay a reasonable access fee.
Cutting off Piedmont residents from library access just ensures less money available for the already underfunded Oakland library system. My grandparents would call that "cutting off your nose to spite your face". I hope that the two can work out a fair contract for library services.
J
7:19 pm on Saturday, January 8, 2011
On the note of Piedmont Police and fire responding in Oakland its actually quite the opposite. OFD responds far more often to cases in Piedmont than PFD responds in Oakland. As for the police they have taken the stance to NOT respond to Oakland residence and forward them to the Oakland dispatcher, next door, at OPD Headquarters.
Rick Schiller
2:43 am on Sunday, January 9, 2011
According to the Oakland City Auditor in FY 05-06 & FY 06-07 Oakland received in total $756,814 "library service payments" from Oakland and Emeryville in total. Piedmont paid Oakland FY 05-06 $303,578 and FY 06-07 $332,169 total $635,747. Emeryville paid the difference, or $121,067 for the two year period or $60,534 annually. Piedmont’s current annual fee is over $350,000. I would like to continue to have library privileges but something is financially very wrong in this equation. Why is Piedmont paying about 500% of Emeryville? Considering Emeryville’s enormous tax base and Piedmont’s tax base being homeowners, this situation is especially egregious.
Patrick M Mitchell
8:19 am on Sunday, January 9, 2011
The recently completed East Oakland library on 81st Avenue cost $11.2 million dollars. At $400,000 per year, it would take 28 years to break even. And that doesn't take into account administration costs, ongoing employment (and benefits and pension) costs, future book/periodical/media acquisition costs...and that's just for 1 library! Piedmonters can use any Oakland library they choose. Let's face it, Piedmont gets a screaming deal by not running their own library system, and would continue to do so at the new rate.